Investigating ANU and ICE-6G Ice Model Relative Sea Level Misfits to Determine Viscosity Constraints since the Last Glacial Maximum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33011/cuhj20242279Keywords:
glacial isostatic adjusment, ice, geophysics, modelingAbstract
Abstract
Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) incorporates glacial rebound and gravitational potential to calculate sea level rise. However, many ice models struggle to accurately represent these effects in relative sea level (RSL) predictions. Two widely used ice models that incorporate GIA effects, ANU and ICE-6G, require further analysis to gauge their validity. In this thesis, we compare the model predictions of RSL of the ANU and ICE-6G models against six distinct RSL field datasets using a semi-analytic GIA model. To predict RSL, a GIA model requires an ice model and models of the Earth’s mantle viscosity, density, and elastic structure. While mantle density and elastic structures are reliably constructed from seismology studies, mantle viscosity is not well constrained. We developed 864 simulated mantle viscosity models to run with the ANU and ICE-6G ice models to obtain the predicted RSL data. We analyzed the Root Mean Square (RMS) misfits of the simulated test RSL outputs against the observed RSL field data. We showed that RMS demonstrates error quality of field data is critically important to the GIA modeling process. We also showed the strengths and weaknesses of each ice model through further RMS analysis.
Lay Summary
Sea level change is not only a critical aspect of our climate’s response, but also a novel gateway to understanding the structure of the Earth’s mantle. This understanding is made possible by studying sea level changes over long timescales, such as since the Last Glacial Maximum. The Earth’s crust responds to increased (or decreased) weight of ice on its surface by deforming (or rebounding) and reaching a new equilibrium state over thousands of years. The response time and altered geometryof the crust give information about mantle viscosity. Observations and calculations of sea level over time geospatially constrain historical ice models, creating an opportunity to determine the most appropriate viscosity. This research identified two widely used ice models (ANU and ICE-6G) to reconstruct present day sea level, combined with varying values for the Earth’s upper and lower mantle. Findings were then compared with observations to identify minimum misfits—calculations that are closest to observation values. By understanding the factors that influence these discrepancies, the researchers hope to improve the accuracy of future models and predictions of sea level changes.
For the full text and references, please visit https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/z603qz79c.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors whose work is accepted and who publish with The University of Colorado Honors Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all objects that may result in subsequent electronic or print publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a non-exclusive license, which grants the Journal the right to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: a. Right of publication in the print format of the journal; b. Right of publication in the online and/or digital format of the journal; c. Right to use in promotional or other journal-related activities, as defined by the journal.
4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
5. The Author represents and warrants that: a. the Work is the Author’s original work; b. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party; c. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher; d. the Work has not previously been published; e. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and f. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
11-August-2014
