Redesigning Peppers RNA Imaging System
An Investigation of In Vivo and In Vitro Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33011/cuhj20242421Keywords:
RNA, Fluorescence ImagingAbstract
Abstract
RNA is a central component of biochemistry as it carries genetic information, has enzymatic activity, mediates protein biodiversity, and supports other cellular functions. Scientists are continually developing new tools for studying RNA and applying it to fields of research such as medicine and molecular biology. RNA imaging provides one avenue for characterizing RNA by looking at trafficking, localization, and lifetime in living cells. Imaging tools have been on the rise in the past 20 years, providing innovative methods for looking at this nucleic acid under a microscope. Peppers is one of these tools designed by Chen et al. at the East China University of Science and Technology. Peppers is an RNA aptamer engineered to bind a fluorescent probe in a stem loop. The 8Peppers aptamer is the optimized form of their probe and is not repeating units of one aptamer, but a long hairpin turn with eight binding spots for probe; this 8Peppers aptamer has been shown to have difficulties folding into native conformation. This paper aims to redesign Peppers RNA imaging system to produce an effective imaging system with enhanced folding capabilities. This paper looks at its in vitro capabilities by fluorescence assay of RNA binding to the probe, HBC620. The redesigned Peppers imaging system is further tested by live cell imaging to determine the efficacy of redesigning the structure, stem, and synonymization of non-consequential regions. The experiments did not show an enhanced fluorescence turn-on or folding capabilities of redesigned Peppers compared to Chen’s original Peppers imaging system. However, the original Peppers imaging tool did not have reproducible results and illustrated the need for a comprehensive and standardized characterization system for RNA imaging tools to be dependable.
Lay Summary
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) is an integral part of any living organism, just like DNA, or your genetic code. RNA’s primary function is to convey genetic information from instruction to the actual product; it acts like the recipe for cells to make proteins. It has many other functions and can contribute to disease, thus it is important to develop more informative metrics of studying RNA.
Imaging RNA involves using high powered microscopes that look at cells. The RNA can be seen by tagging it with a molecule that makes it light up under certain wavelengths of light, also known as fluorescence. This allows researchers to track where a molecule of RNA is moving within a cell, how it moves, and how long it lasts. This is invaluable for better understanding the complicated, yet essential, role RNA plays in biology.
In this experiment, I set out to optimize an RNA imaging system named Peppers by redesigning the structure of the RNA into something that forms more reliably. Peppers did not have a strong fluorescence signal and it wasn’t clear if the imaging was actually showing RNA.
After testing this redesigned system in cells and in a test tube, it became clear that many RNA imaging platforms do not work as well as they boast. I found that the redesigned Peppers, original Peppers, and controls performed the same and that none of the results were statistically significant; this was consistent with other researchers’ frustrations with these tools. Thus, I call to action a more standardized system for characterizing RNA imaging as the field quickly grows. Researchers should be able to make an educated choice on which tool to use and how to analyze their data accurately.
For the full text, please visit https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/ms35tb04h.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors whose work is accepted and who publish with The University of Colorado Honors Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all objects that may result in subsequent electronic or print publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a non-exclusive license, which grants the Journal the right to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: a. Right of publication in the print format of the journal; b. Right of publication in the online and/or digital format of the journal; c. Right to use in promotional or other journal-related activities, as defined by the journal.
4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
5. The Author represents and warrants that: a. the Work is the Author’s original work; b. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party; c. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher; d. the Work has not previously been published; e. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and f. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
11-August-2014
